Yes! Plasma needs a whole host of controls that mills don't. Not to mention that consumable wear is exponentially faster than a mill cutter.
More even than just THC, which is really only useful for thin material. Real-time control over speed and delays from the pendant is what I have always used. Once a material is dialed in it is saved to NV memory on the motion controller.
This is not a trivial thing though and may not be possible using Masso's architecture. The developers undoubtedly have constraints we are not aware of, priorities we are not privy to, and concerns we are ignorant of. Not to mention they are smart!
Below is control box of Plasmacam here in the USA. the encoder knob will adjust travel speed in real time both faster and slower. Z axis buttons allow real time THC cut height adjustment while cutting. If pause before cut is enabled (but after ohmic touch-off you) can adjust the pierce height. Of course when the cut is done these new settings can be saved as a named configuration.
Here is the pendant from Multicam plasma. It uses an embedded motion controller connected over ethernet. I loaded all material configurations direct from Hypertherm into my machine, which gets you close for most cuts. The pendant displays a job loaded and askes for XY origin and material being cut. It also tracks total pierces and cut time and will apply an offset to keep consumables in spec.
No going back and forth to a computer to adjust cutting parameters. All this can be edited at the machine.
This is not a criticism of any kind. These are both mature companies and vastly more expensive. I just feel like Masso could be really great at plasma!